Related sites:  daviscru.com | campuscrusadeforchrist.com | psw.org | ccci.org

 
 
NEWSLETTERS
SPECIAL SECTIONS
LINKS

 

 

Anthropology Questionnaire

 

  1. What does the Bible mean when it says that man has been created in "the image of God"?
    • 3 main views have been promoted regarding how exactly man reflects "the image of God":

    1. Dominion - we reflect the image of God because God gave us dominion over creation. We are stewards of God's creation. This sets us apart from all other creatures.
    2. Relationship - The Bible says that we were created male and female. The fact that we were created as male & female is analogous to the relationship that exists within the Trinity
    3. Substantive - this view says that there is something inherent within us that makes us reflect "the image of God". Some believe that our physical bodies reflect God (Mormons hold this view). Others believe that our moral capacity is what separates us from the other creatures in God's creation. Other aspects that fit into this category would be the fact that man can create, we have a Spirit as does God, and we have the ability to reason.

      I believe that the Substantive view is probably the most likely. I don't think the Mormon view that we reflect God as a physical being is Biblical though. However, I think that what separates us from animals (and therefore gives us the ability to reflect God's image) is the following:

    • We have a spirit that can relate to God. It's been debated that animals also have spirits. Even if this is true, animals do not have the ability to enjoy fellowship with God as men do.
    • We have the ability to reason and create.
    • We have a moral capacity to know right and wrong.
    • In addition, we can reflect the communicable attributes of God. We can demonstrate love, grace, mercy, kindness and faithfulness to others.
    • We have an emotional makeup that is much more complex than animals.
    • We can experience the joy and depth of human relationships and we can clearly communicate with one another on an emotional level

      Other reasons could be cited but this list will do.

       

  2. How would you define sin?
  3. A common definition for sin that has been promoted is "selfishness". Though it is true that much sin is rooted in selfishness, this definition is somewhat incomplete.

    Several ideas are communicated in the Bible to characterize sin. Among them are the ideas of transgression, which basically means to cross a line. Another idea communicated is the idea of "missing the mark". "Iniquity" is a term that means to deviate from a right course. Another common idea that characterizes sin is the idea of rebellion.

    Putting all these ideas together, a short definition of sin is:

    Any action or attitude that violates the commands or the character of God.

     

  4. Do you believe that man is born basically good, basically bad, or neutral? Why?
  5. This is an important question, affecting not only your view of mankind but also your view of man's need.

    Liberal theology says that man is born basically good or neutral, but that man is affected negatively by society. Therefore, liberal theology tends to emphasize social change rather than individual regeneration.

    Similarly, Pelagianism (based on Pelagius, a British contemporary of Augustine) says that man is born with a good nature and the ability to freely choose right. This view was rejected as heresy because it diminished man's need for a Savior. In this view, it was possible for man to come to God on his own merit apart from the need for a savior.

    The Biblical view is that man is born with a sin nature that gives him a tendency to sin. This sin nature is what causes us to sin. In other words, we sin because we're sinners. We're not sinners because we sin. These two statements seem similar but there is a difference, which though subtle, makes a big difference. In the first sentence, we are sinners because we have a sin nature. Thus we sin because it's our nature. In the second statement, we are labeled sinners only when we sin. Thus, if one could avoid sinning, he would not be a "sinner". The Bible clearly affirms that we are born with a sin nature, hence we're sinners by nature.

    David said in Psalm 51:5: "Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me. "Similarly, in Psalm 58:3, David said, "the wicked go astray from the womb, they err from their birth, speaking lies." Paul agrees in Ephesians 2:3 where he says, "we are by nature children of wrath."

     

  6. What is meant by the phrase "original sin"?
  7. Some think of the term original sin as referring to the first sin of Adam and Eve. This is not an accurate representation of the term. The term "original sin" usually refers to the inherited sin nature within man. Wayne Grudem has alternately referred to it as "inherited sin" because it refers to the inherited sin nature that all men have as a result of the sin of Adam.

     

  8. How do you think people acquire their sin nature?

    The Bible says that all men have a sin nature that has been imputed to them because of the sin of Adam (see Romans 5). The word "impute" means "to ascribe", "to credit to". Basically, because Adam sinned, each one of us is credited as having sinned too. It's as if we committed the sin that Adam did. Therefore, we are guilty of the sin. The result is that every man since Adam (with the exception of Christ) is born with a sin nature.

    How is this sin credited to us? There are two views: Federalism and Seminalism

    Federalism says that Adam was our representative. His choice affects us all because he was a representative of all mankind. He sinned - therefore as our representative he sinned on behalf of all mankind.

    Seminalism says that we sinned because we were in Adam when he sinned. This view emphasizes the biological fact that Adam was the progenitor of the entire human race. Every human was literally present in the loins (or semen) of Adam. Therefore, our nature was corrupted when Adam sinned. We were there, in Adam (in his loins); therefore we are guilty and we are corrupted.

    I personally think seminalism makes more sense. This is based largely on a passage in Hebrews 7:4-10, which states that Levi (who had not been born yet), paid a tithe to Melchizidek through Abraham. How? Because Levi was in the loins of Abraham. However, it should be noted that there are strong arguments for both views and well-known Christians on both sides.

    The important thing that all evangelicals agree on is that Adam's sin has been imputed to each member of the human race. Therefore, we are guilty. Additionally, we each have an inherited sin nature that causes us to sin. Because we've been corrupted we are in need of a savior.

 
 

LOWEDOWN.com:  Statement of faith | Donate | Contact Us 

Copyright © 2003 Dave & Jennifer Lowe. No part of this website may be reproduced without permission. Written by Dave Lowe. Dave and his wife Jennifer are on staff with Campus Crusade for Christ, International. 

 

This page last updated 09/05/2003